requestId:684c3e12398d96.22000850.
Assessment of the “difference” thinking history
Author: Li Xuqiang (Associate Professor of the Department of Chinese Studies in Singapore, and an important research on Chinese thinking history and classical reviews)
Source: “Hangzhou Teachers’ Major Research. Social Science Edition”, 2020 Issue 1
Time: Confucius’ Gengzi in 2570 On the 2nd day of the spring, Yimao
� What is the original meaning of Kong 平台? What is the original meaning of Kong 平台? What is the original meaning of Kong 平台???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? Although the descendants have their own training basis, they often have different opinions. Overview of the Dark Lord 2: It is like first setting up a rational position and then using the training to make a certificate. The Han Confucian essays, the Taoist essays of Song and Ming essays, and even the Qing Dynasty’s plain academic examinations are not purely a discussion of right and wrong, and they do not have their own thoughts and historical ideas. From the Han Dynasty to the middle leaves of the Qing Dynasty, the “difference” had long been different from Confucius’ original words and was influenced by the Internet, and it still remains unchanged today. In fact, things are like wires, and they must have two ends. According to Confucius’ original intention, “attacking the opposite” actually means that when people’s governance, one thing should pay attention to two aspects, so that they can form a whole. If one aspect is biased, it will definitely have its harm. This article considers the historical establishment, seeks truth from facts, and traces the remarks of the word “different” from age to the Ming and Qing dynasties, and conducts a review of the original meaning of Confucius.
Keywords: Confucius; strangeness; original meaning; thinking about history; verbal learning;
1. Media
The word “different” often has a network tomorrow. The so-called “difference” refers to the meaning of “righteousness”. Since the “duan” is not correct, it is extended to the so-called “evil statement”, so it cannot be taken. Confucius (551-479 BC) said: “If you attack the wrong ones, you will be harmed.” (“The Second of the Constitution”) The original text does not have the opposite of “difference” and “righteousness”, but since the Han Dynasty, the teachers have considered “difference” to “strangeness” as “extraordinary skills”, and their meaning is very clear. In the Song Dynasty, the old saying was more influenced by Cheng and Zhu’s knowledge, thinking that the oddity was “not the way of a sage” and “it would be very harmful if you specialize in the governance and want to be refined.” 1 “The way of the saint” is the evil way. Cheng and Zhu used “attack” to train “governance”, but “ye” was used as a false word. Sun Yiyi, who was at the same time as Zhu Xi (1130-1200), used “六” as the word “六” to interpret it, while “attack” means “ccusation”. Criticize the odds, the harm can be stopped. However, both solutions are different, but the same include meaning is the object of the attacker’s discussion or criticism. In fact, before the Song Dynasty, the commentator alsoAll like this. Jiao Xun (1763-1820) and Song Xiangfeng (1779-1860) in the Qing Dynasty said that “difference” is the two ends of one thing, not the object of the attacker’s discussion or criticism. Things are like wires, and they must have two ends. “Attacking the opposite” actually means that when human governance, one should pay attention to the fact that one thing must have two ends before it can form a whole. If one end is biased, it will definitely have its harm. This article is based on the establishment of thought history, seeking truth from facts, and traces the remarks of the word “different” from age to the Ming and Qing dynasties, and conducts a review of the testimonies to find the true meaning of Confucius’ original words.
2. Interpretation of the original meaning of “就文” with Han Confucianism
The existing literature was revealed. Before Confucius, the word “就文” seemed to have not been used. The analysis of the kingdom of the country at the same time as Confucius (545-501 BC) is deeply rooted in the principles of name and principles, and advocates the rule of punishment and name, and conveys his words:
Therefore, those who talk about it are different, so that they will not harm each other; the order and distort them will not be inconsistent, and they will not be in conflict with each other, but will not be in conflict with each other. If words are in harmony and words are in harmony, they are invisible to shift each other, which is not the ancient meaning. [1](P.3)2
There is no doubt about the discussion. The words “special” and “different” refer to different types of speech or conceptual patterns of different natures. “Separate” and “order” are to divide words and concepts so that each is of category and is well-reasoned. “Liezi·Liming” calls it “Tao Jue’s analysis of the two qualities, and sets a trait of no sacredness” [2] (PP.201-202). The so-called “Tao Jue” seems to refer to the different opinions that were originally divided into “special” and “different”. After analysis of the roundabout and twists and turns and reversal of no sacredness, it may eventually be the same in different ways, because the purpose of the quotation is to “confuse the will and the will, not to be in harmony with each other.” “Common intention” but not inconsistent, the order of “different” may be different, but there is no way to interoperate. 3. When reflecting on what Confucius said, “If you attack the wrong ones, you will have harmed it.” In terms of the rules of the matter, it is obviously not a sign of the meaning. From this we can see that the word “different” is not an art at the end of the age and has different meanings. Therefore, it has no fixed meaning, and its actual meaning must be determined by its text.
Students have always been neglected, and the word “different” has actually been applied to it. “Confucius’s Family Words·Decisional Government” has the following dialogue:
Zi Zhao asked Confucius: “In the past, King Qi asked about politics from the Master, and the Master said: ‘Politics is in the money.’ Lord Lu asked about politics from the Master, and the Master said: ‘Politics is in the support of ministers.’ Lord Ye asked about politics from the Master, and the Master said: ‘Politics is in the near future and comes far away.’ The three are the questions, but the Master’s differences, but is the difference in politics in the opposite direction?” Confucius said: “Each is based on his affairs. King Qi is a country and is extravagant in TaixieBaobao.com evaluation, lust in the garden, with a good character, and not understanding it at the time. Once a person is given a thousand cyclical family, he is said to be ‘politics in the money’. The king of Lu had three ministers, and he was compared to Zhou to fool his king, and he was away from the lord of the lord.To cover up its clarity, it is said that “politics are in charge of ministers.” The land of the zodiac is vast and the capital is vast. People have a desire to live in a nearby place, so they are said to be “politics are close and come far away.” These three are different politically. “The Book of Poetry” says: “I have no favor to my teacher!” This is because I am extravagant and unreasonable. He also said: ‘It is not the only one who stops the common people, but only the king of Qiong. ’This is a treacherous minister who conceals the master and thinks it is a scammer. He also said: “It’s a mess, why is it suitable for you?” ’This is the one who is scattered and dispersed. Looking at these three things, is it the same as the government wants?” [3] “Decisional Government”, PP.161-162)
First, “difference” is not an art, it is easy to see. Confucius said: “For government, virtue, is like the North Chen, where it lives and the stars are arched. ”[4](“Speech·Su Zheng”, P.53) The so-called “virtue” is based on the most basic principle. When I saw the Master’s answers, I asked him that “politics is in the opposite direction”, which refers to the actual laws of politics, such as “financial wealth”, “conflict ministers”, and “recently far”. The laws should be determined by special circumstances, “each is based on their own affairs”, but the most basic prin
